 |
| Army cutworms created this large die-off near Bruneau, Idaho in 2014. |
In brief
• Exotic cheatgrass fuels rangeland wildfires in the intermountain west.
• Cheatgrass die-offs are large bare patches that appear suddenly in cheatgrass-invaded areas.
• Die-offs are opportunities to reseed invaded areas with native species while there are few cheatgrass seeds to sprout and compete with sown plants.
• Army cutworms (ACW) consume cheatgrass seedlings to produce die-offs and can also defoliate native shrubs. The larvae hide in plain sight by feeding at night in winter and spring and hiding during the day. Later, they pupate in the soil and fly away.
• Major ACW outbreaks and die-offs in 2003 and 2014 occurred during drought broken by late summer rain, which germinated cheatgrass for larvae to eat.
• Two recent federal reports overlook ACW as the most likely cause of die-offs.
• Both reports state that fungal pathogens cause cheatgrass die-offs. However, fungi have not been linked to die-offs, are rare during drought, and would require a more complex series of events to damage cheatgrass.
Download a pdf of this post here.
Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)
die-offs are bare areas, often covered with gray plant litter, that appear suddenly within stands of
normal-looking cheatgrass. Die-offs have distinct boundaries and can cover up
to several square miles. Perennial grasses and forbs within die-offs are
unaffected, but the exotic annual mustards (Brassicacaea) that often grow with
cheatgrass are also missing. Cheatgrass die-offs are sporadic in time and space: widespread
die-offs occur relatively rarely, and die-offs only infrequently reappear in the
same place.
Die-offs first appeared in low, dry areas of the intermountain west in 2003, during a major army cutworm (ACW) (Euxoa auxiliaris) outbreak. B. Hammon of Colorado State University (personal communication 2003) described conditions leading to the outbreak and die-offs:
1. a previous year of dry weather created many egg-laying sites,
2. late summer rain germinated cheatgrass for larvae to eat,
3. a large flight of ACW (miller) moths in fall laid many eggs,
4. dry fall and winter weather allowed many larvae to survive and consume cheatgrass seedlings.
Ranchers and at least one researcher watched ACW eat cheatgrass in early 2003. Entomologists saw extensive ACW damage to crops in southwest Colorado and northern New Mexico. I saw a cheatgrass die-off in Nevada on April 17, 2003, but didn’t learn the cause of the bare area until later that year.
 |
| Army cutworm outbreaks in the intermountain west are most likely after a year of dry weather is broken by September rain, followed by a large flight of miller moths, and a second period of dry weather through January. |
My 2004
research poster described how ACW outbreaks could create cheatgrass die-offs (Salo and Zielinski 2004). I recognized the appropriate conditions in January 2014 and found ACW in cheatgrass die-offs in late February in Owyhee County, Idaho. Die-offs also occurred in
northern Nevada in 2014. In a
research paper, I documented larval damage and vegetation recovery (Salo 2018).
A remote sensing study has since confirmed that cheatgrass die-offs are most likely during a dry winter following a previous dry year (Weisberg et al. 2017). The lead author told me their study did not look at the effect of September precipitation.
Army cutworms are the most likely cause of cheatgrass die-offs
 |
| By spring, army cutworms are big and easy to spot. |
Army cutworms are the simplest, most direct cause of these events. Ranchers, who are out on rangelands in winter and at night far more than researchers and federal land managers, are familiar with ACW eating both cheatgrass and crops. Entomologists watch for
ACW damage to wheat and canola, closely related to cheatgrass and weedy mustards.
The life histories of ACW and cheatgrass interact to create sporadic and spotty die-offs. To reach outbreak levels, ACW need cheatgrass seedlings for food in winter and early spring. Cheatgrass seeds need significant rain during usually-dry September to germinate in time to feed ACW. The rarity of significant rain at this time means that ACW outbreaks are relatively rare. The larvae earn their common name for their habit of marching
en masse to find and consume essentially all their preferred plants--creating bare areas.
 |
| Adult miller moths emerge in late spring. |
After ACW pupate, the adult miller moths fly to high elevations, leaving no fingerprints behind. The moths spend the summer feeding on nectar
and being fed upon by bears.
The following fall, the moths catch wind currents back to low elevations. The capriciousness of wind makes it unlikely that eggs will be laid in the same place more than once. A
remote sensing study found that over 80% of die-off sites do not experience die-offs the following year (Weisberg et al. 2017).
However, both recent federal reports overlook the evidence and state that fungal pathogens cause cheatgrass die-offs. Both cite
Meyer et al. 2016’s book chapter, “Community ecology of fungal pathogens on
Bromus tectorum.”
Occam’s Razor shaves away fungal pathogens
Occam’s Razor reminds us that the simplest explanation that fits the evidence is usually the correct one. Army cutworms are the simplest explanation for die-offs—with the most evidence. None of the fungi studied by Meyer et al. and described in their 2016 book chapter have been clearly linked to die-offs. They do not report studying pathogenic fungi of exotic mustards, which are also missing from die-off areas and are readily eaten by ACW.
Meyer et al. 2016 state that fungal pathogens “sometimes interact to increase the total impact on B. tectorum stand structure, which can result in stand failure or ‘die-off’,” (page 193). They suggest that “thick litter created by [Rutstroemiaceae] may create conditions conducive to the success of Fusarium seed rot organism the subsequent year,” (page 218). This explanation is more complex, less direct, and supported by less evidence than the ACW explanation.
Differences between ACW and fungi in weather conditions when outbreaks occur, local patterns of damage, and local persistence point all to the former as the most likely cause of die-offs (Table 1).
Weather: Cheatgrass die-offs occur during dry weather.
Most pathogenic fungi need wet conditions to grow, spread, and infect plants. Army cutworm outbreaks typically occur during dry weather lasting about 1½ years, broken by unusual late summer rain, to reach outbreak levels. Remote sensing work has also found that die-offs occur during drought (Weisburg et al. 2017).
Local damage pattern: Cheatgrass die-offs are bare soil.
Three of the five fungi discussed in Meyer et al. 2016, Ustilago bullata, Tilletia bromi, and a type of Rutstroemiaceae, infect cheatgrass without killing the plants. These organisms prevent the production of normal seeds, but do not destroy plants: they do not create the bare patches seen in cheatgrass die-offs.
Pathogenic fungi can’t move to seek out host plants. Fungi are moved by wind or water, which typically produce spotty local patterns of fungal diseases. Some fungal diseases, such as
late blight of potato, which led to the Irish potato famine, can kill essentially all plants in an area. However, these fungi leave fields of decaying plants, not bare areas. Army cutworms consume plants to bare soil.
Local persistence: Cheatgrass die-offs usually last only one year.
The other two fungi discussed in Meyer et al. 2016, Pyrenophora semeniperda and Fusarium spp., kill seeds in the soil; Fusarium spp. can also kill seedlings. P. semeniperda is one of many soil fungi that kill cheatgrass seeds, but the effect of this fungus on cheatgrass stands is negligible (Meyer et al. 2016, page 208).
Fusarium spp. can be a serious problem in crops, as pathogenic fungi usually persist in an area longer than one year. For example, gardeners rotate tomatoes with other crops and plant resistant varieties to avoid
Fusarium wilt (
F. oxysporum). Army cutworms, in contrast, leave the scene after creating die-offs, and winds rarely carry moths back to the same spot in later years.
Previous reports of cheatgrass die-offs
Meyer et al. 2016 discuss previous reports of abnormal cheatgrass growth. However, neither appears to have been caused by pathogenic fungi. The first seems to describe an ACW outbreak; the second, a dense stand of cheatgrass.
Report 1: Cheatgrass winterkill in southwest Idaho in 1960
 |
| Klemmedson documented the 1960 cheatgrass die-off |
Klemmedson describes an event in 1960 near Glenns Ferry, Idaho strikingly similar to the 2003 and 2014 die-offs: large, litter-covered bare areas that end abruptly normal-appearing cheatgrass; unaffected perennial Sandberg bluegrass (
Poa secunda); and a summer cover of Russian thistle (
Salsola kali).
I have suggested that this event, and a similar one in 1949 in Payette County, Idaho, were caused by ACW outbreaks (Salo 2017, slides 26, 27).
Glenns Ferry, Idaho recorded conditions before the 1960 die-off strikingly similar to those before the 2003 and 2014 ACW outbreaks and cheatgrass die-offs: a previous year of dry weather, heavy September rain, and a dry fall and early winter from October through January (Table 2).
Klemmedson and Smith 1964 suggest that desiccation or pink snow mold caused the 1960 event and cite
Sprague’s 1953 description of the mold. According to Sprague,
Microdochium nivale =
Fusarium nivale) attacks grasses “in late winter, either under the snow or during raw winter weather.” The attacked leaves turn into “pink or straw-colored mats, which dry to paper films,” (page 271).
However, snow and raw winter weather would have been unlikely during the dry winter of 1959–1960. In addition, Klemmedson’s photos and descriptions show the litter that often covers cheatgrass die-offs, not the papery films of pink snow mold. The weather conditions, photos, and descriptions all point to ACW, rather than pink snow mold, as the cause of the 1960 die-off.
Report 2: Cyclic succession on abandoned cropland in southern Idaho in 1941 Meyer et al. 2016 cite
Piemeisel’s 1951 report of “degenerate” cheatgrass stands “in which seed production was prevented and stand loss ensued,” (page 195). Meyer et al. 2106 continue, “He credited this effect to increasing intraspecific competition, but it seems plausible that plant pathogens…could have played a role. This process is very similar to the ‘die-off’ or stand failure in
B. tectorum monocultures documented in recent years.”
 |
| Piemeisel 1951 describes dense cheatgrass stands |
However, the pattern Piemeisel describes (right), and that Meyer et al. say is similar to cheatgrass die-offs, is the opposite of that seen on cheatgrass die-offs.
Piemeisel reports islands of cheatgrass, “as small as a few feet in diameter…in parts of a field in 1941 where downy chess [=cheatgrass] was beginning to establish,” (page 56). The “degenerate” stand at the center was “a disk composed of a very dense, short growth of immature plants…with barely emerging heads.” Plants
in the outer portions of the islands were progressively more robust as the plant density decreased.
Cheatgrass die-offs, on the other hand, are large bare areas cut out of normal-appearing cheatgrass stands—the inverse of Piemeisel’s islands. He certainly seems to describe intraspecific competition in cheatgrass, not a die-off.
Army cutworms are the most likely cause of cheatgrass die-offs
Researchers and ranchers have watched the larvae consumer cheatgrass, mustards, and the leaves of native shrubs (Salo 2018). The life cycles of cheatgrass and ACW, driven by weather, interact to produce periodic larval outbreaks that create die-offs sporadically across low, dry areas in the intermountain west.
When we understand ACW enough to predict their
outbreaks, we’ll know when and where to look for die-offs. My “trapline” in
Owyhee County, Idaho monitors fall miller moth flights; nearby weather stations in Grand
View and Murphy record precipitation. When conditions that lead to ACW
outbreaks occur though the end of January, it’s time to start looking for
larvae and die-offs. Reseeding die-offs with desirable native species will let the sown plants get started while there are few cheatgrass seeds in the soil to sprout and compete with them.
Literature cited
Hammon. 2003. Personal communication.
